Follow @brucekauffmann

Dr. Seuss: Genius and Ham

“If I were invited to a dinner party with my characters, I wouldn’t show up.” – Dr. Seuss

The incomparable cartoonist, author and inspiration to children — and adults — everywhere died this week (Sept, 24) in 1991, having written 46 children’s books that sold more than 200 million copies.  Theodor “Dr. Seuss” Geisel — Seuss was his middle name — had wanted to be a college professor, but his talent for “doodling” quirky characters and his gift for tongue-twisting rhymes and inventive wordplay convinced him that he should become a writer and illustrator, and he loved writing for children most of all.  And children, most of whom were bored to tears by the so-called educational benefits of Fun With Dick and Jane and See Spot Run, loved him in return.

His first book, And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street was rejected by 27 publishers before Vanguard Press took a chance.  It became an instant success, and Bennett Cerf, president of Vanguard’s parent company, Random House, later said, “I’ve published any number of great writers, from William Faulkner to John O’Hara, but there’s only one genius on my author’s list.  Ted Geisel.”

His other famous books include Green Eggs and Ham, which he wrote after betting an editor he could write a book using only 50 words, The Cat in the Hat, Yertle the Turtle, and arguably his most famous, How the Grinch Stole Christmas, which became an award-winning television Christmas special seen by tens of millions through the years.

Perhaps his most famous character, however, was the elephant Horton, who first starred in Horton Hatches an Egg, in which Horton is duped into sitting on a bird’s egg until it hatches, which he doggedly does through bad weather and other inconveniences — “I meant what I said and I said what I meant.” Horton explains, “An elephant’s faithful 100 percent.”  Sure enough, his persistence pays off when (a typical Seuss twist) the hatched bird turns out to be part elephant.

Horton reappears in Horton Hears a Who, which caused some controversy because Horton’s recurring line, “A person’s a person no matter how small!”, was adopted by pro-life groups to signal Seuss’s anti-abortion leanings. However, Seuss disavowed the claim, stating he was merely writing to entertain.

And entertain he did, not only children, but also adults.  His book You’re Only Old Once! dealt with the challenges of aging, while his last book before he died, Oh, the Places You’ll Go!¸ was a whimsical look at life’s journey and the roadblocks one must face.

Seuss once aptly described his writing style.  “I may doodle a couple of animals,” he explained, “and if they bite each other, it’s going to be a good book.”

Follow @brucekauffmann

Quote of the Week

“All men are equal not in respect of their gifts but that everyone has a will capable of choice …  The indeterminancy of time means that events never happen once and for all.  The good may fall, the bad may repent, and suffering can be, not a simple retribution, but a triumph.” – W.H. Auden 

Follow @brucekauffmann

Thinking Out Loud: The Founders’ Take on the Welfare State

Americans today are more dependent on the largesse of the federal government than at any time in our history.  Government dependency — defined as those persons receiving one or more federal benefit payments — is the highest ever (47 percent).  Welfare spending is also the highest ever, at $700 billion annually.  More Americans are on food stamps than ever before, nearly 40 million, almost double what it was when President Bush left office.  And, of course, America is $17 trillion in debt.

When Republicans complain about this, they are labeled uncaring and unmindful of the fact that most of them were born into affluence, or at least had solid middle-class backgrounds, that gave them a distinct advantage over the nation’s less fortunate.

So what would the Founding Fathers say about all of this?  Surely there were many less fortunate Americans in the 18th Century who couldn’t take care of themselves and needed assistance in order to survive.  How did the Founder’s approach this age-old problem?

By firmly recognizing that, yes, less fortunate Americans needed help, but the government should be the helper of last resort.  The best way to assist the less fortunate was through local civic institutions — family, church, neighbors, community groups, charitable organizations — which were far more familiar with the conditions that caused poverty and hardship among their fellow citizens, and thus were better able to address the causes of the problem.  To the Founders, a food stamp or other welfare program administered in Washington and intended to benefit citizens in localities hundreds, even thousands of miles away, was unfathomable.

Emphasizing local citizen organizations over distant government bureaucrats also made sense because, while many citizens in the 18th Century were truly disadvantaged, many others — as is even more the case today — were gaming the system due to laziness and irresponsibility.  As such, those in the local community organizations, having regularly interacted with their fellow citizens, were far more likely than a federal bureaucrat working in Washington to identify the truly needy, as opposed to the lazy and irresponsible.

Finally, in the Founders’ day citizens were far less permissive. Personal, moral and civic responsibility were considered crucial to the community’s, and nation’s, welfare, and those who exhibited those traits, even if they had fallen on hard times, were welcomed and helped.  Those who did not were not.

By contrast, in today’s culture of “moral relativism” we have become so permissive there is hardly any stigma attached to living off the government, and in some programs — food stamps being one — the government has actually encouraged enrollment.

Ben Franklin once wrote, “The more public (government) provisions that were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer.”