Follow @brucekauffmann

The Jews as Scapegoats in the Civil War

Of the myriad problems besetting Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War, what to do about government anti-Semitism was not high on his list.  But it confronted him nevertheless, this week (Dec. 17) in 1862 when Union General Ulysses S. Grant issued his infamous General Order No. 11, expelling Jews from trading with the Union Army.  It was the first official act of governmental discrimination against Jews as a race in American history, although, individually, Jews had suffered constant discrimination.

Grant was neither more nor less anti-Semitic than most, which is to say that he thought Jews were stereotypically greedy Shylocks who preyed on, and profited from, the inability of the government to adequately supply the Union army with food, medicine and clothing.  Certainly both the Union and Confederate armies had their share of peddlers, profiteers and hangers-on, all looking to make a buck off the plight of the regular soldier.  In fact, the problem was so bad in the Confederate army, which had far fewer resources, military and otherwise, than the Union Army, that most Confederate officers tolerated these traders because they helped save their armies from starvation.

Adding insult to injury, most of these traders were not Jewish at all.  Grant merely assumed that because they were traders who attached themselves to his army, they had to be Jewish — and, being Jews, were undoubtedly charging extortionist prices for their goods.  Thus his Order stated, “The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, are hereby expelled (from trading) within twenty-four hours from receipt of this order.”

Stunned by this unprecedented official act of discrimination, Jewish leaders vehemently protested to the government in Washington, prompting Lincoln to rescind Grant’s Order.  Lincoln made it clear that he had no objection to expelling individual traders who were gouging Union soldiers, but since Grant’s Order targeted Jews “as members of a whole class,” it was unacceptable.

Continue reading

Follow @brucekauffmann

What If … Churchill Had Died?

For years historians have speculated on how history might have changed if certain “near misses” and “What ifs…” had actually occurred.  One that always makes me shudder is this: What if, when he was hit by a cab this week (Dec. 12) in New York City in 1931, Winston Churchill had died?

To set the stage, Churchill was in New York on a paid lecture tour, and having spent the day of December 12 writing, he was to dine that evening with American financier Bernard Baruch. But upon hailing a cab he realized he had forgotten Baruch’s address.  After he and the cabby had driven around 5th Avenue to no avail, Churchill decided to get out and walk. He thought he would recognize the house from the sidewalk.

From the Central Park side of 5th Avenue, Churchill decided to cross the street, but forgetting that Americans drive on the right — not the left like the British — he looked the wrong way to see if the street was clear. Satisfied, he entered the crosswalk, was promptly hit by another cab and was dragged several yards before landing hard on the pavement. Rushed to the hospital, Churchill was diagnosed with two cracked ribs, a head wound that had exposed bone, a mangled right foot and several cuts and bruises. He would also contract pleurisy.

But he would recover and later lead England to victory over Hitler and Nazi Germany.  Had he not — had he died then and there — then whichever British leader was in power in June of 1940 would have gazed across the English Channel to find that Hitler controlled virtually the entire European mainland. Possessing neither Churchill’s rhetorical gifts, nor his indomitable spirit, nor his intuitive understanding that compromise with Hitler was a fool’s game, this leader would almost certainly have negotiated a peace with Hitler that — in the (vain) hope of saving the British Isles — would have solidified Hitler’s death grip on Europe and eventually doomed England.

Such a negotiated peace might even have involved some German say in England’s internal affairs, but it most certainly would have forbidden any future alliance with the United States.  Thus there would be no England to serve as the home base for the U.S. Army in 1944 (meaning no D-Day). With no nearby place to station troops, weapons or war material, America’s ability to fight in Europe would have been so compromised that it would have had very little power to affect the outcome of the war.

In other words, a prostrate England and an impotent U.S. would have been no threat to Hitler, allowing him to fully concentrate on his bitter fight with the Soviet Union.

Germany would have won World War II.